4.6 Article

Ecological risks assessment of organophosphorus pesticides on bloom of Microcystis wesenbergii

Journal

INTERNATIONAL BIODETERIORATION & BIODEGRADATION
Volume 77, Issue -, Pages 98-105

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2012.11.010

Keywords

Organophosphorus pesticide; Chlorophyll fluorescence; The maximum photochemical efficiency; Microcystis wesenbergii

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [40876074, 41176104]
  2. Key Project of NSFC-Guangdong Joint Fund [U1133003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hormesis induced by organophosphorus pesticides (OPPs) on Microcystis wesenbergii was studied to demonstrate the mechanism of water bloom. The dosage response of OPPs on M wesenbergii was detected in the presence and absence of inorganic phosphorus. The results showed median inhibitory effect concentrations of phoxim, trichlorphon, dimethoate and glyphosate-isopropylammonium on fluorescence of chlorophyll a at 96 h were 13.48, 148.52, 38234, 6.84 mu mol l(-1) respectively. Fluorescence of chlorophyll a was stimulated significantly in low OPPs treatments, ranged among 1/10,000-1/20 EC50 concentrations. However, remarkable increase in the maximum photochemical efficiency was only detected under certain treatments and time points. Physiological traits showed no remarkable difference between OPPs as sole phosphorus treatments and non-phosphorus treatments. However, both decreased significantly when compared with inorganic phosphorus (PO4-3) treatments. The results indicated that M. wesenbergii was not capable of utilizing OPPs as phosphorus and the stimulatory effect caused by inert ingredients was negligible. Hormetic response induced by OPPs increased competitive advantage to overcome other species. Therefore, this study confirmed that abusive utilization of OPPs had stimulatory impact on population dynamic of M. wesenbergii. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available