4.6 Article

Benzo[a]pyrene removal by axenic- and co-cultures of some bacterial and fungal strains

Journal

INTERNATIONAL BIODETERIORATION & BIODEGRADATION
Volume 64, Issue 7, Pages 538-544

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2010.05.006

Keywords

PAHs; Biodegradation; Mixed cultures; Penicillium; Serratia

Funding

  1. Mexico s National Council for Science and Technology (CONACyT) [46982]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The efficiencies of several biological strategies as potential enhancers for removal of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) were evaluated by analyzing benzo[a]pyrene depletion at three different concentrations viz 25 50 and 75 mg L-1 The effect of using individual cultures of different fungal or bacterial strains and combinations of the two to obtain defined fungal-bacterial co-cultures on benzo[a]pyrene removal was evaluated The microbial test strains included Aspergillus niger Penicillium Trichoderma harzianum Saccharomyces cerevisiae Serratia marcescens Bacillus mycoides and Pseudomonas sp Depletion profiles under various treatment conditions ranged from 9 to 84% and from 1 to 35% for fungal and bacterial cultures respectively The highest removal rate in all the treatments was achieved consistently by the fungal strains and in general pure cultures of both bacteria and fungi were found to be more sensitive to variations in benzo[a]pyrene concentration When different defined fungal-bacterial co-cultures were tested benzo[a]pyrene removal was higher (65% 50 mg L-1) with the Penicillium sp/S marcescens co-culture Our results show that the use of fungal cultures was more effective for benzo [a]pyrene degradation than the use of bacterial cultures even when the concentration was increased three-fold Moreover it shows that the use of a defined fungal-bacterial co-culture can enhance benzo[a] pyrene biodegradation (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available