4.3 Article

Mal d 2, the Thaumatin-Like Allergen from Apple, Is Highly Resistant to Gastrointestinal Digestion and Thermal Processing

Journal

INTERNATIONAL ARCHIVES OF ALLERGY AND IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 147, Issue 4, Pages 289-298

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000144036

Keywords

Allergenicity; Circular dichroism; Food allergen; Protein stability

Funding

  1. Austrian Science Fund [SFB-F01802]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The stability of food allergens to proteolysis and thermal denaturation contributes considerably to their allergenicity. Methods: Mal d 2, an allergenic thaumatin-like protein ( TLP) from apple, was isolated and purified by anion exchange chromatography. Its IgE reactivity was tested by ELISA and immunoblotting using sera from apple allergic patients. The proteolytic stability of Mal d 2 was investigated using two in vitro digestion models. Effects of thermal treatment at different pH values on the secondary structure of the protein were recorded by circular dichroism. The level and IgE reactivity of Mal d 2 present in industrially prepared foods were assessed. Results: Purified Mal d 2 consisted of two isoforms. Both harbored carbohydrate moieties and bound serum IgE from apple allergic individuals. Mal d 2 showed remarkable stability to proteolysis and thermal treatments. The allergen remained intact after 2 h each of gastric and subsequent duodenal digestion retaining its full IgE-binding capacity. Mal d 2 was unfolded at neutral and acidic pH at 70 degrees C. Refolding after cooling was only observed at acidic pH. Mal d 2 detected by an anti-TLP antibody in cloudy apple juice did not bind IgE of a serum pool of apple allergic patients. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that Mal d 2 maintains its structure in the gastrointestinal tract, a feature essential for sensitizing the mucosal immune system and provoking allergic reactions. Copyright (C) 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available