4.2 Article

Association between Silent Brain Infarct and Arterial Stiffness Indicated by Brachial-ankle Pulse Wave Velocity

Journal

INTERNAL MEDICINE
Volume 51, Issue 9, Pages 1003-1008

Publisher

JAPAN SOC INTERNAL MEDICINE
DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.51.6852

Keywords

arterial stiffness; brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity; intima-media thickness; silent brain infarct; small vessel disease; white matter hyperintensities

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective The aim of this hospital-based cohort study was to clarify the independent association between silent brain infarct (SBI) and arterial stiffness indicated by brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) including the cutoff value for SBI. Methods We studied 240 consecutive patients (mean age 69 years) with no history of stroke. We assessed the presence of SBI, white matter hyperintensities (WMHs), and risk factors. Arterial stiffness was evaluated using baPWV. We measured the intima-media thickness of the common carotid artery (CCAIMT) using carotid ultrasonography. We divided patients into two groups according to the presence or absence of SBI, and compared clinical characteristics between the two groups. Results In multivariable analysis, increased baPWV [by 1 m/s; odds ratio (OR) 1.13, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02-1.25] was independently associated with SBI. The baPWV cutoff value for SBI was 17.49 m/s. Patients with baPWV >= 17.49 m/s had a higher possibility of the presence of SBI (OR 2.30, 95% CI 1.02-5.34) compared with patients with baPWV < 17.49 m/s. Furthermore, the adjusted OR for the presence of SBI of the combination of baPWV >= 17.49 m/s and CCAIMT >= 1.1 mm (OR 2.73, 95% CI 1.24-6.11) was higher compared with that of baPWV >= 17.49 m/s (OR 2.47, 95% CI 1.11-5.65). Conclusion Arterial stiffness is independently associated with SBI. Measurement of baPWV can indicate the presence of SBI, especially in patients with baPWV >= 17.49 m/s.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available