4.2 Article

Lacrimal Gland Function in Autoimmune Pancreatitis

Journal

INTERNAL MEDICINE
Volume 48, Issue 12, Pages 939-943

Publisher

JAPAN SOC INTERNAL MEDICINE
DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.48.2107

Keywords

IgG4; steroid; Schirmer's test

Funding

  1. Research for Intractable Disease of the Pancreas, Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) may be a pancreatic lesion of IgG4-related systemic disease. Lacrimal gland swelling is a rare extrapancreatic lesion of AIP. The aim of the present study was to investigate lacrimal gland function in AIP patients, and to determine changes after steroid therapy. Patients and Methods Schirmer's test and sialochemistry were done prospectively in 11 AIP patients. These tests were also performed after steroid therapy in 7 patients. Results Dysfunction of tear secretion was found in at least one eye in 7 (64%) patients. The average lower level in both eyes was 4.3 +/- 1.5 mm in the 7 patients with lacrimal gland dysfunction, which was significantly lower than the 8.2 +/- 2.4 mm in patients with normal lacrimal gland function (p=0.005). There were no significant differences between the two groups in age at diagnosis of AIP, sex ratio, and the presence of swelling of the lacrimal glands and the salivary glands. Although there was no significant difference, mean serum IgG4 levels and mean salivary Na+ and beta 2 microglobulin levels were lower in patients with normal lacrimal gland function. After steroid therapy, lacrimal gland function improved in 3 of 5 patients with impaired lacrimal gland function, though the degree of improvement was not marked compared to the improvement of salivary gland function. Conclusion Lacrimal gland function was frequently impaired in AIP patients, even when no lacrimal gland swelling was observed clinically. Lacrimal gland function impairment appears to be similar to impairment of salivary gland function in AIP patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available