4.6 Article

Arterial pressure changes during the Valsalva maneuver to predict fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients

Journal

INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE
Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages 77-84

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00134-008-1295-1

Keywords

Valsalva maneuver; Fluid responsiveness; Arterial pressure; Cardiac output; Cardiac preload; Spontaneous breathing

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To evaluate whether arterial pressure response during a Valsalva maneuver could predict fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients. Prospective clinical study in a 17-bed multidisciplinary intensive care unit. Thirty patients without mechanical ventilation and equipped with a radial arterial catheter for whom the decision to give fluids was taken due to suspected hypovolemia. A 10-s Valsalva maneuver was performed before and after volume expansion (VE). Patients were classified as responders if stroke volume index (SVi) increased a parts per thousand yen15% after VE. Pulse pressure changes during the Valsalva maneuver (a dagger VPP) were calculated as the difference between maximal pulse pressure during phase 1 and minimal pulse pressure during phase 2 of the Valsalva maneuver divided by the mean of the two values and expressed as a percentage. Valsalva changes in systolic pressure (a dagger VSP) were calculated in similar way. SVi changes induced by VE was correlated with baseline values of a dagger VPP and a dagger VSP (r (2) = 0.71 and r (2) = 0.60; P < 0.0001, respectively), and with VE-induced changes in a dagger VPP and a dagger VSP (r (2) = 0.56 and r (2) = 0.44; P < 0.0001 and P < 0.001, respectively). A a dagger VPP value of 52% and a dagger VSP of 30% predicted fluid responsiveness with a sensitivity of 91% and 73% and a specificity of 95 and 90%, respectively. Arterial response during the Valsalva maneuver is a feasible tool for predicting fluid responsiveness in patients without mechanical ventilatory support.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available