4.6 Article

Safety and efficacy of ultrasound assistance during internal jugular vein cannulation in neurosurgical infants

Journal

INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE
Volume 34, Issue 11, Pages 2100-2105

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00134-008-1210-9

Keywords

Pediatrics; Cardiovascular monitoring; Peri-operative care

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Ultrasound guidance (USG) for internal jugular cannulation is the best solution in difficult settings where paediatric patients are involved. This is an outcome study on efficacy and complications of the USG for the internal jugular vein (IJV) cannulation in neurosurgical infants as well as an ultrasound study of anatomical findings of the IJVs in infants. Design and settings: A prospective study conducted in two Academic Neurosurgical hospitals. Participants: In 191 babies (body weight < 15 kg), anatomical findings were studied. We performed CVC echo guided placement in 135/191 infants (weighting < 10 kg). Results: After a brief training period, both institutions adopted a common protocol and USG device. We obtained successful cannulation in all patients. Carotid puncture (1.5%) was the only main complication registered and minor complications were poor. Time required for cannulation was 12.5 +/- 5.7 min. Anatomical findings (in 191 patients) were IJV laterality in 34.6% cases, IJV antero-lateral in 59.7% and anterior in 5.7%. A linear relation was found between weight and internal jugular vein diameter even if R-2 stop = 0.43 and the model cannot be used to predict the exact size of the vein. In 62/135 babies weighting < 10 kg, anatomical measurements were done in supine and Trendelemburg position. Trendelemburg position increases significantly (P < 0.001) IJV diameter, but not IJV depth. Conclusions: We considered ultrasound guidance as the first choice in infants because it can enhance IJV cannulation success, safety, and allows one to measure relationships and diameter of the IJV and optimise the central line positioning.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available