4.4 Article

The Integrated Phenotype

Journal

INTEGRATIVE AND COMPARATIVE BIOLOGY
Volume 52, Issue 1, Pages 64-76

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/icb/ics043

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [IOS 1052262, IOS 1146977]
  2. Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology for the symposium
  3. NESCent short-term fellowship
  4. Direct For Biological Sciences [1153657] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Direct For Biological Sciences
  6. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems [1146977] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems [1153657] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Proper functioning of complex phenotypes requires that multiple traits work together. Examination of relationships among traits within and between complex characters and how they interact to function as a whole organism is critical to advancing our understanding of evolutionary developmental plasticity. Phenotypic integration refers to the relationships among multiple characters of a complex phenotype, and their relationships with other functional units (modules) in an organism. In this review, I summarize a brief history of the concept of phenotypic integration in plant and animal biology. Following an introduction of concepts, including modularity, I use an empirical case-study approach to highlight recent advance in clarifying the developmental and genomic basis of integration. I end by highlighting some novel approaches to genomic and epigenetic perturbations that offer promise in further addressing the role of phenotypic integration in evolutionary diversification. In the age of the phenotype, studies that examine the genomic and developmental changes in relationships of traits across environments will shape the next chapter in our quest for understanding the evolution of complex characters.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available