4.4 Article

C23 protein meditates bone morphogenetic protein-2-mediated EMT via up-regulation of Erk1/2 and Akt in gastric cancer

Journal

MEDICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 32, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1007/s12032-015-0547-5

Keywords

C23; BMPRII; EMT; Gastric cancer

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In our previous study, the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) has been identified to be involved in gastric cancer progression. Notably, nuclear protein C23 and bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP2) have been linked into EMT. However, the specific mechanisms underlying BMP2 pathway-mediated EMT are not still unraveled. In this study, we adopted immunohistochemistry and immunoblotting to determine the expression of C23 and BMP2 receptor II (BMPR-II) in 90 gastric cancer samples and cell lines. Subsequently, relevant cell lines were selected to be treated with si-C23 or si-BMPRII and the detection of in vitro assay. Our results revealed that both C23 and BMPRII were aberrantly and constitutively expressed in gastric cancer specimens and cell lines, whose expression was positively associated with metastasis, stage and differentiation, and portended poor survival outcome of gastric cancer patients. In vitro assay validated the increased expression of p-Erk1/2, p-Akt, vimentin, N-cadherin, and MMP2 in BMP2-stimulated MGC803 cells, which was in a dose-dependent manner. By contrast, si-C23 treatment attenuated the BMP2-stimulated expression of p-Erk1/2, p-Akt, vimentin, N-cadherin, and MMP2. Also, the treatment of either si-C23 or si-BMPRII decreased the ability of migration and invasion of MGC803 cells. In conclusion, C23 mediates BMP2-induced EMT progression via the up-regulation of Erk1/2 and Akt signaling pathway in gastric cancer, which indicated both C23 and BMPRII pathway could be recommended as prospective targets or biomarkers to antagonize the progression of gastric cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available