4.1 Article

Increased phosphorylation of ERK1/2 is associated with worse chemotherapeutic outcome and a poor prognosis in advanced lung adenocarcinoma

Journal

MEDICAL MOLECULAR MORPHOLOGY
Volume 49, Issue 2, Pages 98-109

Publisher

SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1007/s00795-015-0130-3

Keywords

Lung adenocarcinoma; EGFR; KRAS; pERK1/2; Chemotherapy; Prognosis

Funding

  1. Nihon University School of Medicine 50th Anniversary Fund Research Grant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Constitutive activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)1/2 pathway, that is activated by various stimuli including growth factors and oncogenic driver mutations, is observed in various cancers. However, the difference of the activated levels of the pathway is still unclear in clinical significances. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of different ERK1/2 pathway activation, assessed by the expression levels of phosphorylated (p) ERK1/2, on the prognosis of advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients. Paraffin-embedded lung biopsy samples were obtained from 85 lung adenocarcinoma patients. Correlation between pERK1/2 expression levels that were assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis and oncogenic driver mutation status, clinicopathological factors, outcome from standard anticancer therapies, and prognosis was investigated. Varying levels of pERK1/2 expression were observed in 68 (80.0 %) patients. The overall survival was significantly reduced in patients with higher pERK1/2 expression in comparison to those with lower expression levels (P = 0.03). In particular, higher pERK1/2 expression levels correlated with worse performance status and worse clinical outcome. Thus, the IHC analysis of pERK1/2 expression levels may predict patient prognosis in advanced lung adenocarcinoma. Inhibition of ERK1/2 pathway activated by various signals may improve the effects of standard chemotherapies and the clinical condition of patients with advanced cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available