4.6 Article

Robust heat-inducible gene expression by two endogenous hsp70-derived promoters in transgenic Aedes aegypti

Journal

INSECT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages 97-106

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2583.2011.01116.x

Keywords

HSP70; promoter; Aedes aegypti; transgenic; mosquito; heat shock; stress

Funding

  1. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [AI071208, AI085091]
  2. Fralin Life Science Institute and Department of Entomology at Virginia Tech.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aedes aegypti is an important vector of the viruses that cause dengue fever, dengue haemorrhagic fever and yellow fever. Reverse genetic approaches to the study of gene function in this mosquito have been limited by the lack of a robust inducible promoter to allow precise temporal control over a protein-encoding or hairpin RNA transgene. Likewise, investigations into the molecular and biochemical basis of vector competence would benefit from the ability to activate an antipathogen molecule at specific times during infection. We have characterized the ability of genomic sequences derived from two Ae. aegypti heat shock protein 70 (hsp70) genes to drive heat-inducible expression of a reporter in both transient and germline transformation contexts. AaHsp70-luciferase transcripts accumulated specifically after heat shock, and displayed a pattern of rapid induction and decay similar to endogenous AaHsp70 genes. Luciferase expression in transgenic Ae. aegypti increased by similar to 2550-fold in whole adults by 4 h after heat-shock, with significant activity (similar to 20-fold) remaining at 24 h. Heat-induced expression was even more dramatic in midgut tissues, with one strain showing a similar to 2500-fold increase in luciferase activity. The AaHsp70 promoters described could be valuable for gene function studies as well as for the precise timing of the expression of antipathogen molecules.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available