4.6 Article

Genome annotation and comparative analyses of the odorant-binding proteins and chemosensory proteins in the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum

Journal

INSECT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Volume 19, Issue -, Pages 113-122

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2583.2009.00919.x

Keywords

Aphids; olfaction; chemical ecology; gene evolution

Funding

  1. BBSRC of the UK
  2. 'Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia' (Portugal) [SFRH/BD/22360/2005]
  3. 'Direccion General de Investigacion Cientifica y Tecnica' (Spain) [BFU2007-62927]
  4. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/22360/2005] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Odorant-binding proteins (OBPs) and chemosensory proteins (CSPs) are two families of small water-soluble proteins, abundant in the aqueous fluid surrounding olfactory receptor neurons in insect antennae. OBPs are involved in the first step of olfactory signal transduction, carrying airborne semiochemicals to the odorant receptors and can be classified into three groups: Classic OBPs, Plus-C OBPs and Atypical OBPs. Here, we identified and annotated genes encoding putative OBPs and CSPs in the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum using bioinformatics. This identified genes encoding 13 Classic and two Plus-C OBPs and 13 CSPs. Homologous OBP sequences were also identified in nine other aphid species, allowing us to compare OBPs across several aphid and non-aphid species. We show that, although OBP sequences are divergent within a species and between different orders, there is a high similarity between orthologs within a range of aphid species. Furthermore, the phylogenetic relationships between OBP orthologs reflect the divergence of aphid evolution lineages. Our results support the 'birth-and-death' model as the major mechanism explaining aphid OBP sequence evolution, with the main force acting on the evolution being purifying selection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available