4.6 Article

Identification and functional characterization of sex pheromone receptors in beet armyworm Spodoptera exigua (Hubner)

Journal

INSECT BIOCHEMISTRY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Volume 43, Issue 8, Pages 747-754

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2013.05.009

Keywords

Spodoptera exigua; Pheromone receptor gene; (Z,E)-9,12-tetradecadienyl acetate; (Z)-9-tetradecenol; Xenopus oocytes

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31230062, 31071752]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2012CB114104]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In moths, males can detect a distinct blend of several pheromone components by specialized olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs) on the antennae. Four candidate pheromone receptors (PR) with seven transmembrane domains were identified by homology cloning from the antennae of Spodoptera exigua (Sexi). Phylogenetic analyses reveal that all four odorant receptors (OR) belong to pheromone receptor subtypes. Expression patterns revealed that PRs were male-specific in the antenna except for SexiOR11, which was female antenna-biased. Functional analyses of these PRs were conducted using heterologous expression in Xenopus oocytes. SexiOR13 and SexiOR16 were all broadly activated by multiple pheromone components. SexiOR13 responded robustly to the critical pheromone component, Z9, E12-14:OAc and the minor pheromone component, Z9-14:OAc at a concentration of 10(-4) M. Dose-response studies indicate that SexiOR13 was approximately 4 times more sensitive to Z9,E12-14:OAc (EC50 = 3.158 x 10(-6) M) compared to Z9-14:OAc (EC50 = 1.203 x 10(-5) M). While, SexiOR16 responded robustly to the secondary pheromone component Z9-14:OH with high sensitivity (EC50 = 9.690 x 10(-7) M). However, similar tests of the five pheromones with SexiOR6 and SexiOR11 failed to elicit any response. These results provide basic knowledge to further advance research on the molecular mechanisms of pheromone reception. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available