4.6 Article

Novel nicotinic action of the sulfoximine insecticide sulfoxaflor

Journal

INSECT BIOCHEMISTRY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Volume 41, Issue 7, Pages 432-439

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2011.01.009

Keywords

Insecticide; Sulfoxaflor; Myzus persicae (green peach aphid); Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor; Radioligand binding; Electrophysiology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The novel sulfoximine insecticide sulfoxaflor is as potent or more effective than the neonicotinoids for toxicity to green peach aphids (GPA, Myzus persicae). The action of sulfoxaflor was characterized at insect nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) using electrophysiological and radioligand binding techniques. When tested for agonist properties on Drosophila melanogaster D alpha 2 nAChR subunit co-expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes with the chicken beta 2 subunit, sulfoxaflor elicited very high amplitude (efficacy) currents. Sulfoximine analogs of sulfoxaflor were also agonists on D alpha 2/beta 2 nAChRs, but none produced maximal currents equivalent to sulfoxaflor nor were any as toxic to GPAs. Additionally, except for clothianidin, none of the neonicotinoids produced maximal currents as large as those produced by sulfoxaflor. These data suggest that the potent insecticidal activity of sulfoxaflor may be due to its very high efficacy at nAChRs. In contrast, sulfoxaflor displaced [H-3]imidacloprid (IMI) from GPA nAChR membrane preparations with weak affinity compared to most of the neonicotinoids examined. The nature of the interaction of sulfoxaflor with nAChRs apparently differs from that of IMI and other neonicotinoids, and when coupled with other known characteristics (novel chemical structure, lack of cross-resistance, and metabolic stability), indicate that sulfoxaflor represents a significant new insecticide option for the control of sap-feeding insects. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available