4.7 Article

Cp*Co(III) Catalysts with Proton-Responsive Ligands for Carbon Dioxide Hydrogenation in Aqueous Media

Journal

INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Volume 52, Issue 21, Pages 12576-12586

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ic401707u

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST), ACI-C
  2. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-98CH10886]
  3. Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, & Biosciences, Office of Basic Energy Sciences

Ask authors/readers for more resources

New water-soluble pentamethylcyclopentadienyl cobalt(III) complexes with proton-responsive 4,4'- and 6,6'-dihydroxy-2,2'-bipyridine (4DHBP and 6DHBP, respectively) ligands have been prepared and were characterized by X-ray crystallography, UV-vis and NMR spectroscopy, and mass spectrometry. These cobalt(III) complexes with proton-responsive ligands predominantly exist in their deprotonated [Cp*Co(DHBP-2H(+))(OH2)] forms with stronger electron-donating properties in neutral and basic solutions, and are active catalysts for CO2 hydrogenation in aqueous bicarbonate media at moderate temperature under a total 4-5 MPa (CO2:H-2 1:1) pressure. The cobalt complexes containing 4DHBP ligands ([1-OH2](2+) and [1-Cl](+), where 1 = Cp*Co(4DHBP)) display better thermal stability and exhibit notable catalytic activity for CO2 hydrogenation to formate in contrast to the catalytically inactive nonsubstituted bpy analogues [3-OH2](2+) (3 = Cp*Co(bpy)). While the catalyst Cp*Ir(6DHBP)(OH2)(2+) in which the pendent oxyanion lowers the barrier for H-2 heterolysis via proton transfer through a hydrogen-bonding network involving a water molecule is remarkably effective (ACS Catal. 2013, 3, 856-860), cobalt complexes containing 6DHBP ligands ([2-OH2](2+) and [2-Cl](+), 2 = Cp*Co(6DHBP)) exhibit lower TOF and TON for CO2 hydrogenation than those with 4DHBP. The low activity is attributed to thermal instability during the hydrogenation of CO2 as corroborated by DFT calculations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available