4.7 Article

NiO@ZnO Heterostructured Nanotubes: Coelectrospinning Fabrication, Characterization, and Highly Enhanced Gas Sensing Properties

Journal

INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Volume 51, Issue 14, Pages 7733-7740

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ic300749a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars of China [60925018]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51002062, 61177042, 11174111]
  3. Frontier Science and Interdisciplinary Innovation Projects of Jilin University [421030951419]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Novel NiO@ZnO heterostructured nanotubes (NTs) were fabricated by the coelectrospinning method, consisting of external hexagonal ZnO shell and internal cubic NiO NTs. They are carefully investigated by scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, scanning transmission electron microscopy, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy mapping, X-ray diffraction, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy techniques. A reasonable formation mechanism of the hierarchical NiO@ZnO NTs is proposed, which is discussed from the view of degradation temperature of different polymers and the amount of inorganic salts. They were then explored for fabrication of H2S gas sensors. The gas sensing test reveals that compared with the pure ZnO, NiO, and the ZnO-NiO mixed gas sensors, hierarchical gas sensor exhibits highly improved sensing performances to dilute hydrogen sulfide (H2S) gas. The response of the optimum NiO@ZnO NTs sensor to 50 ppm H2S increases as high as 2.7-23.7 times compared to the other sensors, whereas the response and recovery times also become shorter considerably. These enhanced gas sensing properties are closely related to the change of nanostructure and activity of ZnO and NiO nanocrystals as well as combination of homo- and heterointerfaces in the optimum gas sensor, which are confirmed by a series of well-designed experiments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available