4.7 Review

Slow Dynamics of the Magnetization in One-Dimensional Coordination Polymers: Single-Chain Magnets

Journal

INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Volume 48, Issue 8, Pages 3420-3437

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ic802050j

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European network MAGMANet [NMP3-CT-2005515767]
  2. EC-TMR Network QuEMoINa [MRTN-CT2003-504880]
  3. University of Bordeaux
  4. CNRS
  5. Region Aquitaine
  6. Spanish Ministry of Science and Education
  7. Consolider Ingenio 2010 (Molecular Nanoscience)
  8. CREST
  9. PRESTO projects
  10. Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST)
  11. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology, Japan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Slow relaxation of the magnetization (i.e., magnet-like behavior) in materials composed of magnetically isolated chains was observed for the first time in 2001. This type of behavior was predicted in the 1960s by Glauber in a chain of ferromagnetically coupled Ising spins (the so-called Glauber dynamics). In 2002, this new class of nanomagnets was named single-chain magnets (SCMs) by analogy to single-molecule magnets that are isolated molecules displaying related superparamagnetic properties. A long-range order occurs only at T = 0 K in any pure one-dimensional (1 D) system, and thus such systems remain in their paramagnetic state at any finite temperature. Nevertheless, the combined action of large uniaxial anisotropy and intrachain magnetic interactions between high-spin magnetic units of the 1D arrangement promotes long relaxation times for the magnetization reversal with decreasing temperature, and finally at significantly low temperatures, the material can behave as a magnet. In this Forum Article, we summarize simple theoretical approaches used for understanding typical SCM behavior and some rational synthetic strategies to obtain SCM materials together with representative examples of SCMs previously reported.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available