4.7 Article

Analysis of the spin lattice model for the spin-gapped layered compounds Na3Cu2SbO6 and Na2Cu2TeO6 on the basis of electronic structure calculations

Journal

INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Volume 47, Issue 1, Pages 128-133

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ic701153z

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea [핵06A3002] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The spin lattice model for the spin-gapped layered magnetic solids Na3Cu2SbO6 and Na2Cu2TeO6 was examined by evaluating the three spin exchange interactions of their Cu2MO6 (M = Sb, Te) layers in terms of spin dimer analysis based on extended Huckel tight binding calculations and mapping analysis based on first principles density functional theory electronic band structure calculations. For both compounds, our calculations show that the two strongest spin exchange interactions, that is, the Cu-O center dot center dot center dot O-Cu super-superexchange (J(2)) and the Cu-O-Cu superexchange (J(1)) interactions, form alternating chains that interact weakly through the Cu-O-Cu superexchange (J(3)) interactions. The dominant one of the three spin exchange interactions is J(2), and it is antiferromagnetic in agreement with the fact that both of the compounds are spin gapped. For Na3Cu2SbO6 and Na2Cu2TeO6, the superexchange J(1) is calculated to be ferromagnetic, hence, leading to the alternating chain model in which antiferromagnetic and ferromagnetic spin exchange interactions alternate. This picture does not agree with the recent experimental analysis, which showed that the temperature-dependent magnetic susceptibilities of both compounds should be described by the alternating chain model in which two antiferromagnetic spin exchange interactions of different strengths alternate.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available