4.7 Article

Changes in oxidation, color and texture deteriorations during refrigerated storage of ohmically and water bath-cooked pork meat

Journal

INNOVATIVE FOOD SCIENCE & EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES
Volume 26, Issue -, Pages 341-346

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ifset.2014.06.009

Keywords

Ohmically; Water bath; TBARS; Oxidation

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31271894]
  2. Ministry of Agriculture of China [200903012]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the present work, changes in lipid and protein oxidation, non-heme iron (NHI) content, color and texture parameters during refrigerated storage (7 days/4 degrees C) of ohmically (OH) and water bath (WB)-cooked pork meat were studied. A significant effect of refrigerated storage duration and cooking method on color, texture, lipid oxidation and carbonyl content was detected for OH-cooked and WB-cooked meat The OH-cooked meat had better color appearance, lipid oxidative stability, slightly enhanced hardness and protein oxidation levels during 7 days of storage having lower values of TBARS, center lightness (L*), center/surface brownness (b*) and free thiol groups; however, there were higher values of center/surface redness (a*), non-heme iron, protein carbonyl and hardness compared to those from WB-cooked meat Industrial relevance: The conventional cooking protocols always result in quality deteriorations and reduced shelf-life in meat products due to longer cooking times. In this study, the ohmically-cooked meat showed comparable or improved oxidation levels, color appearance and texture attributes during 7 days of refrigerated storage. From an anti-oxidation perspective, the available data are provided for the application of ohmic cooking in Chinese commercial productions of cooked meat with high quality requirements that could be established. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available