4.4 Article

Effect of fragmentary displacement and morphology in the treatment of comminuted femoral shaft fractures with an intramedullary nail

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.10.015

Keywords

Reversed fragment; Femoral shaft; Fracture; Displacement

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Our study aimed to determine whether the displacement and morphology of a fragment in femur fracture with Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association/32B/ 32-C (AO/OTA/32-B/32-C) classification affect the outcomes following closed reduction and internal fixation with an interlocking nail. Design: This was a retrospective study. Setting: The study was conducted at a Level III trauma centre. Patients: A total of 50 consecutive patients presenting femoral shaft fracture with AO/OTA-type 32-B/32C were included in the present study. Interventions: Patients were divided into two groups according to the displacement of the fragments. In the large displacement group, patients were further subgrouped according to whether a reversed morphology of the fragment was present. Outcomes measurement: The radiographic union score of femur (RUSF), the mean union time and the reoperation rate were assessed. Results: The union rate of small- and large-gap groups at 12 months postoperatively was 75.9% and 21.1%, respectively (p = 0.000). The mean union time of those union cases in these two groups was 7.8 and 13.0 months, respectively (p = 0.000). The union rate of the non-reversed and reversed groups at 12 months postoperatively was 30% and 11.1%, respectively (p = 0.179). The mean RUSF at 12 months in the non-reversed and reversed groups was 8.8 and 8.3, respectively (p = 0.590). However, we found that patients presenting a reversed fragment had an increased risk of more than one re-operation (p = 0.030). Conclusions: A fragmentary displacement of > 1 cm in AO/OTA-type 32-B/32-C femoral shaft fracture after nailing affected bone healing. Among the large-gap group patients, an unreduced reverse fragment presented a negative prognostic factor for re-operation. Level of evidence: Prognostic level III. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available