4.7 Article

Decision making with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations based on additive consistency analysis

Journal

INFORMATION SCIENCES
Volume 467, Issue -, Pages 115-134

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2018.07.036

Keywords

Decision procedure; IVIFPR; Additive consistency; Consensus; Programming model

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71571192, 71671188]
  2. Innovation-Driven Project of Central South University [2018CX039]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of Central South University [2018zzts094]
  4. Major Project for National Natural Science Foundation of China [71790615]
  5. State Key Program of National Natural Science of China [71431006]
  6. Hunan Province Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of China [2016JJ1024]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper discusses the theory and application of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations (IVIFPRs). To do this, we first introduce an additive consistency concept for IVIFPRs that can address the issues in previous ones. Then, several additive consistency based programming models for judging the consistency of IVIFPRs and for determining missing values are constructed. Furthermore, an approach for calculating the interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy priority weight vector is offered. With respect to group decision making with IVIFPRs, a consensus index is offered, and an interactive algorithm for improving the consensus level is proposed that can ensure the additive consistency. After that, a consensus analysis-based programming model for determining the weights of decision makers is built. Furthermore, a consistency-and-consensus-based group decision making method that can address inconsistent and incomplete IVIFPRs is developed. Finally, a practical decision-making problem about evaluating talents in universities is offered to show the feasibility and efficiency of the new method. (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available