4.7 Article

An information theoretic approach to improve semantic similarity assessments across multiple ontologies

Journal

INFORMATION SCIENCES
Volume 283, Issue -, Pages 197-210

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2014.06.039

Keywords

Semantic similarity; Information Theory; Ontology; MeSH; SNOMED-CT

Funding

  1. European Commission
  2. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [eAEGIS TSI2007-65406-C03-01, ICWT TIN2012-32757, ARES-CONSOLIDER INGENIO 2010 CSD2007-00004, BallotNext IPT-2012-0603-430000]
  3. Government of Catalonia [2009 SGR 1135]
  4. AvieSan national program (French national alliance for life sciences and health)
  5. French Agence Nationale de la Recherche 'Investissement d'avenir/Bioinformatique' [ANR-10-BINF-01-02 'Ancestrome']

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Semantic similarity has become, in recent years, the backbone of numerous knowledge-based applications dealing with textual data. From the different methods and paradigms proposed to assess semantic similarity, ontology-based measures and, more specifically, those based on quantifying the Information Content (IC) of concepts are the most widespread solutions due to their high accuracy. However, these measures were designed to exploit a single ontology. They thus cannot be leveraged in many contexts in which multiple knowledge bases are considered. In this paper, we propose a new approach to achieve accurate IC-based similarity assessments for concept pairs spread throughout several ontologies. Based on Information Theory, our method defines a strategy to accurately measure the degree of commonality between concepts belonging to different ontologies this is the cornerstone for estimating their semantic similarity. Our approach therefore enables classic IC-based measures to be directly applied in a multiple ontology setting. An empirical evaluation, based on well-established benchmarks and ontologies related to the biomedical domain, illustrates the accuracy of our approach, and demonstrates that similarity estimations provided by our approach are significantly more correlated with human ratings of similarity than those obtained via related works. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available