4.7 Article

Pareto-based grouping discrete harmony search algorithm for multi-objective flexible job shop scheduling

Journal

INFORMATION SCIENCES
Volume 289, Issue -, Pages 76-90

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2014.07.039

Keywords

Flexible job shop scheduling; Harmony search algorithm; Multi-objective optimization; Local search

Funding

  1. Remanufacturing Scheduling Systems of A*Star (Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore) [112 290 4021]
  2. National Science Foundation of China [61174187]
  3. Basic Scientific Research Foundation of Northeast University [N110208001]
  4. Starting Foundation of Northeast University [29321006]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes a Pareto-based grouping discrete harmony search algorithm (PGDHS) to solve the multi-objective flexible job shop scheduling problem (FJSP). Two objectives, namely the maximum completion time (makespan) and the mean of earliness and tardiness, are considered simultaneously. Firstly, two novel heuristics and several existing heuristics are employed to initialize the harmony memory. Secondly, multiple harmony generation strategies are proposed to improve the performance of harmony search algorithm. The operation sequence in a new harmony is produced based on the encoding method and the characteristics of FJSP. Thirdly, two local search methods based on critical path and due date are embedded to enhance the exploitation capability. Finally, extensive computational experiments are carried out using well-known benchmark instances. Three widely used performance measures, number of non-dominated solutions, diversification metric and quality metric, are employed to test the performance of PGDHS algorithm. Computational results and comparisons show the efficiency and effectiveness of the proposed PGDHS algorithm for solving multi-objective flexible job-shop scheduling problem. (C) 2014 Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available