4.7 Article

An improved migrating birds optimisation for a hybrid flowshop scheduling with total flowtime minimisation

Journal

INFORMATION SCIENCES
Volume 277, Issue -, Pages 643-655

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2014.02.152

Keywords

Metaheuristics; Operations research; Scheduling; Hybrid flowshop

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation of China [61174187]
  2. NSFC-MSRA joint program [60933012]
  3. Basic Scientific Research Foundation of Northeast University [N110208001]
  4. Starting Foundation of Northeast University [29321006]
  5. Science Foundation of Liaoning Province in China [2013020016]
  6. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-13-0106]
  7. Basic Scientific Research Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Synthetical Automation for Process Industries [2013ZCX01]
  8. Shandong Province Key Laboratory of Intelligent Information Processing and Network Security (Liaocheng University)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Migrating birds optimisation (MBO) is a new nature-inspired metaheuristic for combinatorial optimisation problems. This paper proposes an improved MBO to minimise the total flowtime for a hybrid flowshop scheduling problem, which has important practical applications in modern industry. A diversified method is presented to form an initial population spread out widely in solution space. A mixed neighbourhood is constructed for the leader and the following birds to easily find promising neighbouring solutions. A leaping mechanism is developed to help MBO escape from suboptimal solutions. Problem-specific heuristics and local search procedures are added to enhance the MBO's intensification capability. Extensive comparative evaluations are conducted with seven recently published algorithms in the literature. The results indicate that the proposed MBO is effective in comparison after comprehensive computational and statistical analyses. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available