4.7 Article

Using a rough set model to extract rules in dominance-based interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information systems

Journal

INFORMATION SCIENCES
Volume 221, Issue -, Pages 215-229

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2012.09.010

Keywords

Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy set; Information systems; Dominance relation; Rough set model; Reduction; Rule extraction

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [61170105]
  2. Jiangsu Natural Science Foundation of China [BK2009395]
  3. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (Audition Science and Technology)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information systems are generalizations of conventional fuzzy-valued information systems. We introduce a dominance relation in the framework of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information systems to come up with the concept we call a dominance-based interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information system (DIIFIS). This system is used to establish a dominance-based rough set model, which is grounded primarily on the substitution of the indiscernibility relation in the classic rough set theory with the aforementioned dominance-based relation. This relation is defined by the score and accuracy of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy value. To simplify knowledge representation and extract useful and simple dominance-based interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy rules, we present two attribute reduction approaches to eliminating redundant information. To demonstrate the potential of these approaches, we apply them to computer auditing risk assessment, decision-making problems in wealth management, and pattern classification. Our findings confirm that the proposed rough set model is an effective means of extracting knowledge from dominance-based interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information systems. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available