4.7 Article

Procedures for reducing large datasets of crystal orientations using generalized spherical harmonics

Journal

MECHANICS OF MATERIALS
Volume 88, Issue -, Pages 73-86

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.mechmat.2015.04.014

Keywords

Orientation distribution function; Spectral methods; Texture difference index; Anisotropy; Crystal plasticity

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [CMMI-1301081]
  2. Hamel Center for Undergraduate Research
  3. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn
  4. Directorate For Engineering [1301081] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a rigorous methodology for the compaction of crystallographic texture data associated with a given material volume and show that a statistical orientation distribution function (ODF) containing any number of orientations can be compacted to a significantly smaller but representative set of orientations. This methodology is based on the spectral representation of ODFs through the use of generalized spherical harmonic functions. The Fourier coefficients of an initial full-size ODF can be matched with those of a more compact but equivalent ODF. The reduced-size ODF contains a predetermined set of representative orientations whose weights are adjusted using an algorithm for finding the closest reduced-size ODF to a given full-size ODF. To demonstrate the accuracy of the methodology, we consider three measured ODFs of two cubic metals (pure Cu and an Al alloy) and a hexagonal metal (pure Zr) and then subsequently perform plane strain and simple compression simulations with both the initial ODFs and the reduced-size ODFs. We quantitatively demonstrate that texture evolution and stress-strain response simulated with reduced-size ODFs are in excellent agreement with those simulated with initial full-size ODFs. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available