4.7 Article

Fuzzy reasoning spiking neural P system for fault diagnosis

Journal

INFORMATION SCIENCES
Volume 235, Issue -, Pages 106-116

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2012.07.015

Keywords

Fault diagnosis; P systems; Spiking neural P systems; Fuzzy knowledge representation; Fuzzy reasoning

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61170030]
  2. Research Fund of Sichuan Key Laboratory of Intelligent Network Information Processing [SGXZD1002-10]
  3. Importance Project Foundation of Xihua University, China [Z1122632]
  4. Ministerio de Educacion y Ciencia of Spain [TIN2009-13192]
  5. FEDER funds
  6. Project of Excellence with Investigador de Reconocida Valia of the Junta de Andalucia [P08-TIC-04200]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Spiking neural P systems (SN P systems) have been well established as a novel class of distributed parallel computing models. Some features that SN P systems possess are attractive to fault diagnosis. However, handling fuzzy diagnosis knowledge and reasoning is required for many fault diagnosis applications. The lack of ability is a major problem of existing SN P systems when applying them to the fault diagnosis domain. Thus, we extend SN P systems by introducing some new ingredients (such as three types of neurons, fuzzy logic and new firing mechanism) and propose the fuzzy reasoning spiking neural P systems (FRSN P systems). The FRSN P systems are particularly suitable to model fuzzy production rules in a fuzzy diagnosis knowledge base and their reasoning process. Moreover, a parallel fuzzy reasoning algorithm based on FRSN P systems is developed according to neuron's dynamic firing mechanism. Besides, a practical example of transformer fault diagnosis is used to demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed FRSN P systems in fault diagnosis problem. (c) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available