4.7 Article

Adaptive strategy selection in differential evolution for numerical optimization: An empirical study

Journal

INFORMATION SCIENCES
Volume 181, Issue 24, Pages 5364-5386

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2011.07.049

Keywords

Differential evolution; Adaptation; Strategy selection; Credit assignment; Numerical optimization

Funding

  1. China University of Geosciences (Wuhan) [CUG100316]
  2. Foundation of State Key Lab of Software Engineering [SKLSE2010-08-13]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61075063]
  4. Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education [20090145110007]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Differential evolution (DE) is a versatile and efficient evolutionary algorithm for global numerical optimization, which has been widely used in different application fields. However, different strategies have been proposed for the generation of new solutions, and the selection of which of them should be applied is critical for the DE performance, besides being problem-dependent. In this paper, we present two DE variants with adaptive strategy selection: two different techniques, namely Probability Matching and Adaptive Pursuit, are employed in DE to autonomously select the most suitable strategy while solving the problem, according to their recent impact on the optimization process. For the measurement of this impact, four credit assignment methods are assessed, which update the known performance of each strategy in different ways, based on the relative fitness improvement achieved by its recent applications. The performance of the analyzed approaches is evaluated on 22 benchmark functions. Experimental results confirm that they are able to adaptively choose the most suitable strategy for a specific problem in an efficient way. Compared with other state-of-the-art DE variants, better results are obtained on most of the functions in terms of quality of the final solutions and convergence speed. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available