4.7 Article

Examining the generalizability of the User Engagement Scale (UES) in exploratory search

Journal

INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT
Volume 49, Issue 5, Pages 1092-1107

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ipm.2012.08.005

Keywords

Interactive information retrieval; Exploratory search; Evaluation; User Engagement Scale; User experience

Funding

  1. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC)
  2. GRAND Network of Centres of Excellence
  3. Canada Research Chairs
  4. Canada Foundation for Innovation
  5. National Science and Engineering Research Council
  6. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council Canada

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The user experience is an integral component of interactive information retrieval (IIR). However, there is a twofold problem in its measurement. Firstly, while many IIR studies have relied on a single dimension of user feedback, that of satisfaction, experience is a much more complex concept. IIR in general, and exploratory search more specifically, are dynamic, multifaceted experiences that evoke pragmatic and hedonic needs, expectations, and outcomes that are not adequately captured by user satisfaction. Secondly, questionnaires, which are typically the means in which user's attitudes and perceptions are measured, are not typically subjected to rigorous reliability and validity testing. To address these issues, we administered the multidimensional User Engagement Scale (UES) in an exploratory search environment to assess users' perceptions of the Perceived Usability (PUs), Aesthetics (AE), Novelty (NO), Felt Involvement (FI), Focused Attention (FA), and Endurability (EN) aspects of the experience. In a typical laboratory-style study, 381 participants performed three relatively complex search tasks using a novel search interface, and responded to the UES immediately upon completion. We used Principal Axis Factor Analysis and Multiple Regression to examine the factor structure of UES items and the relationships amongst factors. Results showed that three of the six sub-scales (PUs, AE, FA) were stable, while NO, FI and EN merged to form a single factor. We discuss recommendations for revising and validating the UES in light of these findings. (c) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available