4.7 Article

Classification of fresh and frozen-thawed pork muscles using visible and near infrared hyperspectral imaging and textural analysis

Journal

MEAT SCIENCE
Volume 99, Issue -, Pages 81-88

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.09.001

Keywords

Hyperspectral imaging; Texture; Fresh pork; Frozen-thawed pork; Probabilistic neural network

Funding

  1. Guangdong Province Government (China)
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2014ZM0027]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The potential of visible and near infrared hyperspectral imaging was investigated as a rapid and nondestructive technique for classifying fresh and frozen-thawed meats by integrating critical spectral and image features extracted from hyperspectral images in the region of 400-1000 nm. Six feature wavelengths (400, 446, 477, 516, 592 and 686 nm) were identified using uninformative variable elimination and successive projections algorithm. Image textural features of the principal component images from hyperspectral images were obtained using histogram statistics (HS), gray level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) and gray level-gradient co-occurrence matrix (GLGCM). By these spectral and textural features, probabilistic neural network (PNN) models for classification of fresh and frozen-thawed pork meats were established. Compared with the models using the optimum wavelengths only, optimum wavelengths with HS image features, and optimum wavelengths with GLCM image features, the model integrating optimum wavelengths with GLGCM gave the highest classification rate of 93.14% and 90.91% for calibration and validation sets, respectively. Results indicated that the classification accuracy can be improved by combining spectral features with textural features and the fusion of critical spectral and textural features had better potential than single spectral extraction in classifying fresh and frozen-thawed pork meat. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available