4.5 Article

Low Counts of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii in Colitis Microbiota

Journal

INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASES
Volume 15, Issue 8, Pages 1183-1189

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1002/ibd.20903

Keywords

colitis; IBD; Crohn's disease; ulcerative colitis; quantitative PCR; fecal microbiota

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The intestinal microbiota is Suspected to play a role ill colitis and particularly ill inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) pathogenesis. The aim was, to compare the fecal microbiota composition of patients with colitis to that of healthy subjects (HS). Methods: fecal samples front 222 active Crohn's disease (A-CD) patients, 10 CD patients in remission (R-CD), 13 active ulcerative colitis (A-UC) patients. 4 UC patients in remission (R-UC), 8 infectious colitis (IC) patients, and 27 HS were analyzed by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) targeting the 16S rRNA gene. Bacterial counts were transformed to logarithms (Log(10) CFU) for statistical analysis. Results: Bacteria of the phylum Firmicutes (Clostridium leptum and Clostridium coccoides groups) were less represented in A-IBD patients (9.7; P = 0.004) and IC (9.4; P = 0.02). compared to HS (10.8), Faecalibacterium prausnitzii species (a major representative of the C. leptum group) had lower Counts in A-IBD and IC patients compared to HS (8.8 and 8.3 versus 10.4; P = 0.0004 and P = 0.003) The Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio was lower in A-IBD (1.3; P = 0.0001) and IC patients (0.4; P = 0.002). Compared to HS, Bifidobacteria were less represented in A-IBD and IC (7.9 and 7.7 Versus 9.2; P = 0.001 and P = 0.01). Conclusions: The fecal microbiota of patients with IBD differs front that of HS. The phylum Firmicutes and particularly the species F. prausnitzii, are underrepresented in A-IBD patients as well as in IC patients. These bacteria could be crucial to Out homeostasis since lower counts Of F. prausnitzii are consistently associated with a reduced protection of the gut mucosa.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available