4.5 Article

Effects of Light Smoking Consumption on the Clinical Course of Crohn's Disease

Journal

INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASES
Volume 15, Issue 5, Pages 734-741

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1002/ibd.20828

Keywords

Crohn's disease; tobacco; smoking

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Cigarette smoking is associated with a more severe Crohn's disease (CD) course. However, the effect of light consumption is not known. Our aim was to characterize the effect of a light tobacco consumption on the course of CD. Methods: We analyzed the course of CD during the period 1995-2007 from date collected in 2795 consecutive patients in whom smoking habits were recorded. Patients were classified as nonsmokers (n = 1420), light smokers (1-10 cigarattes/day; n = 385), heavy smokers (> 10 cigarretts/day; n = 638), and intermittent smokers (change in smoking habits; n = 352). Patient-years while smoking were compared to patient-years without smoking. The analyses considered patient-years regarding annual disease activity and therapeutic requirements. Results: The percentage of years with active disease was 37% in nonsmokers versus 46% in light smokers (P < 0.001; adjusted hazard ratio 1.30 [1.19-1.43]) and 48% in heavy smokers (P < 0.001 adjusted hazard ratio 1.68 [1.57-1.81]), despite an increased use of immunosuppressants in smokers. Hospitalization rates were also increased in both groups of smokers, with 12% in nonsmokers versus 15% in both groups of smokers (P < 0.001 for both comparisons). The annual rate of intestinal resection was 4.5% in nonsmokers, 5.1% in light smokers, and 5.5% in heavy smokers with a significant difference observed between nonsmokers and heavy smokers only (P < 0.01). Conclusions: Light smokers are doing worse than nonsmokers regarding disease activity and the need for immunosuppressants. Complete smoking cessation should be advised in all smokers with CD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available