4.5 Article

Enhanced Phosphorylation of MAPKs by NE Promotes TNF-α Production by Macrophage Through α Adrenergic Receptor

Journal

INFLAMMATION
Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages 527-534

Publisher

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10753-011-9342-4

Keywords

norepinephrine; macrophages; inflammatory factors; mitogen-activated protein kinases

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [30801018]
  2. Innovation Program of Shanghai Municipal Education Commission [09ZZ80]
  3. National Science and Technology Major Project [2009ZX09303-002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to investigate whether norepinephrine (NE) could regulate macrophage production of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) by influencing the phosphorylation of mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs). Primary macrophages from male BALB/c mice were applied to explore the mechanism by which NE influences the the secretion of TNF-alpha when macrophages were activated by lipopolysaccharides (LPS). We found that NE could increase crophage production of TNF-alpha when macrophages were activated by LPS, and this effect could be inhibited by alpha adrenergic antagonist phentolamine. Also, NE could increase the phosphorylation of c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK), extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERK), and p38, through alpha receptor. Furthermore, JNK inhibitor SP600125, ERK inhibitor U0126, and p38 inhibitor SB203580 could all partially counteract NE's effect on the phosphorylation of MAPKs, as well as TNF-alpha production by macrophages. This study revealed that as macrophages were activated by LPS, NE promoted the secretion of inflammatory factors by increasing the phosphorylation of MAPKs through an alpha receptor-dependent pathway. Our results provide the evidence of a relationship between stress and diseases, as well as the mechanism by which stress induces or affects the inflammation-related diseases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available