4.7 Article

Chemical composition, antibacterial activity, and cytotoxicity of essential oil from Nepeta ucrainica L. spp. kopetdaghensis

Journal

INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS
Volume 58, Issue -, Pages 315-321

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.04.009

Keywords

Essential oil; Antibacterial activity; Cytotoxicity; Sesquiterpene; Germacrene D

Funding

  1. Student Research Committee, School of Pharmacy, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chemical composition, antibacterial activity, and cytotoxicity of essential oil (EO) obtained from the aerial parts of Nepeta ucrainica L spp. kopetdaghensis was investigated in the present study. Chemical composition of the EO was analyzed using GC-MS method. Sixty compounds representing 98.7% of the total oil were characterized. The oil was predominated by sesquiterpene hydrocarbons, and the main components were germacrene D (53.0%), bicyclogermacrene (6.4%), beta-bourbonene (4.3%), beta-elemene (3.3%), spathulenol (3.2%), cubenol (2.8%), trans-caryophyllene (2.8%), germacrene A (2.1%), and delta-cadinene (2.0%). The antibacterial activity of the EO was investigated against 6 bacterial strains using serial dilution method. The essential oil showed a good activity against Gram-positive bacteria particularly Staphylococcus aureus (minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC]= 14 mu g/mL, minimum bactericidal concentration [MBC] = 14 mu g/mL), but Gram-negative bacteria were resistant to the oil. Also, the cytotoxic effects of the EO on human ovarian carcinoma A2780 cell line and human breast adenocarcinoma MCF-7 cell line were examined using 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazole-2-yl)-2,5-biphenyl tetrazolium bromide [MTT] assay. The EO was found to be cytotoxic against the tested cell lines, with IC50 values less than 50 mu g/mL for both A2780 and MCF-7 cells. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available