4.7 Article

Towards comprehensive utilization of winemaking residues: Characterization of grape skins from red grape pomaces of variety Touriga Nacional

Journal

INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS
Volume 43, Issue -, Pages 25-32

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.06.047

Keywords

Grape skins; Cellulose; Hemicellulose; Cutin; Pectin; Triterpenic acids; Wax

Funding

  1. Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology-FCT [PTDC/AGR-AAM/104911/2008]
  2. Operation Program of Competitive Factors-COMPETE [FCOMP-01-0124-FEDER-008734]
  3. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/AGR-AAM/104911/2008] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The chemical composition and the structural features of macromolecular components from red grape skins (variety Touriga Nacional) have been evaluated. The results of chemical analyses revealed the following contents of the main constituents: cellulose (20.8%), hemicelluloses (12.5%), proteins (18.8%), tannins (13.8%), extractives soluble in dichloromethane (5.0%) and ash (7.8%). Cellulose of grape skins is typical cellulose I polymorph with a degree of crystallinity of 66.1% as assessed by X-ray scattering. The hemicelluloses were analyzed by neutral sugars analysis, methylation analysis and 1D/2D H-1 NMR. The water-soluble compounds (26.4%) are composed mainly of monomeric sugars (glucose and fructose) and a complex mixture of hemicelluloses, the most abundant being pectin and acetylated glucomannan. The major part of structural polysaccharides (cellulose, xylan, xyloglucan, etc.) is embedded in cuticular layer and is poorly accessible to the acid hydrolysis. The cuticular substances contributed to ca. 8.5% of grape skins and their chemical structure has been evaluated by methanolysis. The possibility of comprehensive utilization of grape skins has been discussed. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available