4.7 Article

Total phenolic content and antioxidant activity of three Iranian endemic Achillea species

Journal

INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS
Volume 50, Issue -, Pages 154-158

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.07.038

Keywords

A. pachycephalla; A. kellalensis; A. aucherii; Total phenolics; Antioxidant activity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bioactive compounds such as phenolics and essential oils involved in medicinal plants are beneficial for human health. Medicinal plants are potential sources of natural antioxidants. The genus of Achillea is comprised of more than 100 species worldwide with different medicinal applications. Nineteen species of Achillea have been recognized in Iran. Since the endemic medicinal species are considered as new natural sources of bioactive compounds, in this study, total phenolics and antioxidant activity of three endemic Achillea species (A. pachycephalla, A. aucherii and A. kellalensis) were compared with a synthetic antioxidant butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT). Total phenolic content was determined according to the Folin-Ciocalteu method and varied from 15.55 mg in A. aucherii to 60.65 mg tannic acid/1 g of dry product in A. pachycephalla. Antioxidant activity of methanolic extract evaluated according to 1,1-diphenyl-2-picryl-hydrazyl (DPPH), ferric thiocyanate (FTC) and beta-carotene-linoleic acid assay. In DPPH assay, A. aucherii showed the highest IC50 (844 mu g/ml), while A. kellalensis and A. pachycephalla possessed 518 mu g/ml and 248 mu g/ml, respectively. For reducing power, A. pachycephalia had the highest absorbance in 700 nm (2.601), while A. aucherii possessed the lowest one (0.236). The results showed that three studied endemic species had acceptable antioxidant activity and can be introduced as important sources of natural antioxidants for pharmaceutical and medical purposes. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available