4.7 Article

Optimization of hempseed oil extraction by n-hexane

Journal

INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS
Volume 48, Issue -, Pages 133-143

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.04.028

Keywords

Artificial neural network; Extraction; Hempseed oil; Modeling; Optimization; Response surface methodology

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia [III 45001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The influence of extraction temperature, solvent:seed ratio and extraction time on hempseed oil yield was investigated. The oil extraction was optimized using the response surface methodology (RSM) coupled with a 3(3) full factorial experiment with two replications and an artificial neural network (ANN) model. For the former method, the second-order polynomial equation and the analysis of variance were used for evaluating the significance of the influence of the extraction variables on hempseed oil yield and for optimizing the extraction process. The ANN model was combined with a genetic algorithm (GA) for the process optimization. The low mean relative percent deviation (MRPD) between the experimental data and predicted oil yield obtained by using RSM and ANN models showed that both models were suitable for modeling the extraction process. The ANN model was more accurate because of lower MRPD value (+/- 1.0%) than the second-order polynomial equation (+/- 2.3%). The established optimal extraction conditions for achieving the maximum hempseed oil yield based on the ANN-GA methodology were extraction temperature 70 degrees C, solvent:seed ratio of 10:1 and 10 min extraction time, under which the predicted and actual hempseed oil yields were 29.56 g/100 g and 29.06 +/- 0.11 g/100 g, respectively. Unsaturated linoleic, linolenic and oleic fatty acids were the main fractions of the fatty acids in the hempseed oil, although the saturated fatty acids were also present. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available