4.7 Article

Effect of molding conditions and moisture content on the mechanical properties of compression molded glassy, wheat gluten bioplastics

Journal

INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS
Volume 44, Issue -, Pages 480-487

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.10.006

Keywords

High-temperature compression molding; Wheat gluten; Rigid materials; Mechanical properties; Protein reactions

Funding

  1. Industrial Research Fund (IOF, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium) [ZKB8979]
  2. Agency for Innovation through Science and Technology Flanders (IWT Vlaanderen) [SBO 100022]
  3. Research Foundation - Flanders (FWO, Brussels, Belgium)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In absence or at low concentrations of plasticizer, high-temperature compression molded wheat gluten powder upon cooling vitrifies into a rigid material. Molding temperature (130-170 degrees C range), molding time (5-25 min range) and gluten powder moisture content (5.6-9.1% range) affect the mechanical properties of compression molded pieces. In this work, the relationship between the molding-induced gluten protein cross-linking and resulting mechanical properties was investigated as a function of the mentioned molding parameters. The flexural modulus was neither affected by any of the processing parameters nor by the resulting altered protein characteristics. In contrast, the strength and failure strain of samples prepared from gluten with the same moisture content increased with increasing degree of protein cross-linking and were maximal when compression molding for 5 min at 170 degrees C. Higher gluten powder moisture contents increased the cross-linking degree for molding at 130 and 150 degrees C. The protein network degraded and the related mechanical properties worsened with longer molding times at 170 degrees C. The extent of degradation increased when gluten powders with higher moisture content were molded. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available