4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Characterization and degradation of lignin from steam explosion of pine and corn stalk of lignin: The role of superoxide ion and ozone

Journal

INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS
Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages 182-188

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2007.07.023

Keywords

lignin; steam explosion; lignin degradation; superoxide ion; ozone; pine; corn stalk

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Steam explosion of corn stalk in the presence of 3% sulphuric acid at 200 degrees C for 5 min gave the highest recovery of lignin. Lignin has M-w = 2640 and M-z = 93,994. In the UV spectrum absorptions at lambda = 231 and 280 nm were recorded. H-1 NMR spectrum of lignin showed signals attributable to cinnamaldehyde units, guaiacyl units, and syringyl units. Syzingyl and guaiacyl units are in 1:1 ratio. C-13 NMR spectrum showed signals for guaiacyl, syringyl, and p-hydroxyphenyl units. The spectrum showed a prevalence of guaiacyl units. The 13C NMR spectrum is in agreement with the presence of cinnamic units. The same characterization was performed on lignin from pine. The irradiation of lignin from pine from steam explosion process in the presence of oxygen, in conditions described for the formation of superoxide ion, for different irradiation time was followed isolating the lignin and determining the average molecular weight. The experiments showed that, until 8 h irradiation, M-n decreases, while Mw and M,, increases. After 8 h irradiation an inverse behaviour was observed, with an increase of M. and a decrease of M. and M.. These results are in agreement with an initial polymerization process followed by a photoinduced degradation. Ozonization was carried out in acetonitrile-methanol solution. The reaction showed a zero-order kinetics. After 50 min the average molecular weight of lignin is the half. The reaction mixture was analyzed by using GC-MS. Oxalic acid was determined. (c) 2007 Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available