4.6 Article

Investigation of Missing-Cluster Defects in UiO-66 and Ferrocene Deposition into Defect-Induced Cavities

Journal

INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
Volume 57, Issue 42, Pages 14233-14241

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.8b03516

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [CBET-1748641, CMMI-1825594]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Advancing our understanding of the defect formation mechanism in metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) is critical for the rational design of the material's structure. In particular, the defects in the UiO-66 framework have been shown to have a significant impact on the framework functionality and stability. However, the effects of synthesis conditions on defect formation are elusive and our understanding of missing-ligand and missing-cluster defects in UiO-66 is far from clear. In this work, we demonstrate that the formation of missing-cluster (MC) defects is due to the large number of partially deprotonated ligands in synthesis solution. The proposed mechanism is verified by a series of syntheses controlling the defect formation. The results show that the quantity of MC defects is sensitive to deprotonation reagents, synthesis temperature, and reactant concentration. The pore size distribution derived from the N-2 adsorption isotherm at 77 K allows accurate and convenient characterization of the defects in UiO-66. The existence of defects in the UiO-66 framework can cause significant deviations in its pore size distribution from the results derived from the theoretically perfect crystal structure. The extra cavities generated by MC defects are demonstrated to allow deposition of a large functional molecule, ferrocene (3.5 angstrom x 4.5 angstrom x 4.5 angstrom). The successful incorporation is proven by the tuning of the original N-2-selective framework to become an O-2-selective framework.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available