4.6 Article

Double Transition-Metal Chalcogenide as a High-Performance Lithium-Ion Battery Anode Material

Journal

INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
Volume 53, Issue 46, Pages 17901-17908

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ie503759v

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. A*STAR Project [1220203049, R279-000-370-305]
  2. International Science and Technology Cooperation Program of China [2012DFG42100]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of China [21173190, 21473156]
  4. Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [2011010113003]
  5. International Science and Technology Cooperation Program of Zhejiang Province [2013C24011]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Transition-metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) are a recent addition to a growing list of anode materials for the next-generation lithium-ion battery (LIB). The actual performance of TMDs is however constrained by their limited electronic conductivity. For example, MoS2, the most studied TMD, does not have adequate rate performance even in the few-layer form or after compounding with nitrogen-doped graphene (NG). WS2, a TMD with a higher intrinsic electronic conductivity, is more suitable for high rate applications but its theoretical capacity is lower than that of MoS2. Hence, we hypothesize that a composition-optimized composite of MoS2, WS2, and NG may provide high capacity concurrently with good rate performance. This is a report on the design and preparation of double transition-metal chalcogenide (MoS2/WS2)-nitrogen doped graphene composites where the complementarity of component functions may be maximized. For example the best sample in this study could deliver a high discharge capacity of 1195 mAh.g(-1) at 100 mA.g(-1) concurrently with good cycle stability (average of 0.02% capacity fade per cycle for 100 cycles) and high rate performance (only 23% capacity reduction with a SO fold increase in current density from 100 mA.g(-1) to 5000 mA.g(-1)).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available