4.6 Article

Preparation and Evaluation of Water-Compatible Surface Molecularly Imprinted Polymers for Selective Adsorption of Bisphenol A from Aqueous Solution

Journal

INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
Volume 53, Issue 37, Pages 14291-14300

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ie5028099

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Program for Changjiang Scholar and Innovative Research Team in University [IRT0972]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20971094, 21176169, 51152001]
  3. Ph.D. Programs Foundation of Ministry of Education of China [20101402110007]
  4. International S&T Co-operation Program of Shanxi Province [2010081017]
  5. Shanxi Scholarship Council of China [2012-038]
  6. Hundred Talent Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences
  7. Hundred Talent Program of Shanxi Province

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Water-compatible molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs) for adsorbing bisphenol A (BPA) in aqueous solutions are synthesized using water-soluble monomer as surface hydrophilicity-increasing agent via surface addition-fragmentation chain transfer polymerization. The formation and structure of these hybrid materials are verified by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, contact angle studies, thermogravimetric analysis, and scanning electron microscopy. The characterization and adsorption results indicate that the molecularly imprinted polymers prepared with 2-acrylamido-2-methylpropanesulfonic acid (AMPS/MIPs) are water-compatible (the contact angle is 14 degrees). The excellent dispersion of AMPS/MIPs in water provides more opportunity for BPA molecules to access the imprinted cavities and improves their recognition characteristics. The kinetics and isotherm data of AMPS/MIPs can be well described by the pseudo-second-order kinetic model and the Langmuir isotherm, respectively. The thermodynamic studies indicate that the adsorption process is a spontaneous exothermic process.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available