4.6 Article

Membrane-Based Oxygen-Enriched Combustion

Journal

INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
Volume 52, Issue 31, Pages 10820-10834

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ie401464z

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. United States Department of Energy, Golden Field Office, Advanced Manufacturing Offices, Grand Challenge Projects [DE-EE0003462]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The use of oxygen-enriched air, instead of ambient air, can significantly improve the energy efficiency of combustion processes and reduce the cost of CO2 capture from flue gases throughout manufacturing industries. This study examines the overall energy savings and economic benefits that can be obtained using oxygen-enriched combustion based on novel membranes and processes to produce oxygen-enriched air. Membrane processes using low-pressure air as a countercurrent sweep in the permeate were used to minimize the energy cost of producing oxygen-enriched air. High-performance thin film composite membranes based on a series of perfluoropolymers and bench-scale spiral-wound modules were prepared, and showed oxygen penmeance as high as 1200 gpu (1 gpu = 10(-6) cm(3)(STP)/cm(2).s.cmHg) combined with O-2/N-2 selectivity of 3.0. The membrane-based oxygen-enriched combustion processes show good energy savings (defined as the fuel savings less the energy consumption of producing oxygen-enriched air) and economic benefits (defined as the value of fuel saved less the operating cost of producing oxygen-enriched air), especially at flue gas temperatures higher than 1090 degrees C (or 2000 degrees F). For example, at a flue gas temperature of 1649 degrees C (or 3000 degrees F), membrane-based oxygen-enriched combustion shows a net energy savings of 35% and a net economic benefit of 2996, compared to the combustion process with air. The effect of oxygen-enriched air on NOx emissions in a natural gas furnace was also experimentally investigated.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available