4.6 Article

Co-Oxidation Effects of Methanol on Acetic Acid and Phenol in Supercritical Water

Journal

INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
Volume 52, Issue 31, Pages 10609-10618

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ie400704f

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education [20090201110010]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Methanol acting as a co-oxidation component was introduced in supercritical water oxidation experiments of acetic acid and phenol which were identified as the most common and refractory intermediates during supercritical water oxidation of many complex organics. Experiments were performed in a tubular flow reactor at 25 +/- 0.5 MPa. The concentrations of acetic acid and phenol were constant at 0.17 and 0.067 mol/L, respectively, with varying methanol concentrations ranging from 0.0313 to 0.6563 mol/L. Computational simulations based on the elementary reaction model for the supercritical water oxidation of two binary mixtures were also carried out to understand the co-oxidation mechanism of methanol for these two compounds. For the binary mixture of methanol/acetic acid, the experimental results showed that the acetic acid conversions in the mixture were higher than those in the absence of methanol, and as the methanol concentration increased, the accelerating effect was more notable. For the methanol/phenol mixture experiment, a low concentration of methanol (0.0313 mol/L) was found to have no measurable effect on phenol conversion, while higher concentrations (0.1563 and 0.3125 mol/L) caused increases in phenol conversions. Calculation results based on the elementary reaction model could reasonably reproduce the experiment trends. Model analyses showed that the methanol-derived HO2 center dot and OH center dot radicals seemed to play an important role in accelerating acetic acid or phenol decomposition.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available