4.6 Review

Current Status of Metal-Organic Framework Membranes for Gas Separations: Promises and Challenges

Journal

INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
Volume 51, Issue 5, Pages 2179-2199

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ie202038m

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [CBET-0930079]
  2. Department of Energy Advanced Research Project Agency-Energy [DE-AR0000073]
  3. Artie McFerrin Department of Chemical Engineering at Texas AM University
  4. Texas Engineering Experiment Station
  5. American Chemical Society [PRF-48884-DNI5]
  6. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys
  7. Directorate For Engineering [0930079] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are hybrid organic-inorganic nanoporous materials that exhibit regular crystalline lattices with relatively well-defined pore structures. Chemical functionalization of the organic linkers in the structures of MOFs affords facile control over pore size and chemical/physical properties, making MOFs attractive for a variety of industrial applications including membrane-based gas separations. A wealth of reports exists discussing the synthesis and applications of MOFs; however, relatively few reports exist discussing MOF membranes. This disparity owes to challenges associated with fabricating films of MOF materials, including poor substrate-film interactions, moisture sensitivity, and thermal/mechanical instability. Since even nanometer-scale cracks and defects can affect the performance of a membrane for gas separation, these challenges are particularly acute for the fabrication of MOF membranes. Here, we review recent progress on MOF membranes with an emphasis on their fabrication techniques, challenges involved in membrane synthesis, reported strategies to address these challenges (issues), and gas separation performance. Finally, we conclude with our perspectives on future research directions in this area.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available