4.6 Review

Removal of Nanoparticles from Gas Streams by Fibrous Filters: A Review

Journal

INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
Volume 52, Issue 1, Pages 5-17

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ie300574m

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23360339] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although the basic principles of fibrous filters have been well understood for capture of micron and submicron sized particles, questions arise when they are applied to nanoscale particles. In the first part of this review, the classical theory of fibrous filters is described with focus on the principles that are applicable to nanoparticle collection. The areas of recent developments reviewed include thermal rebound of nanoparticles and the effects of particle shape, aggregate morphology, flow regime, humidity, fiber size, and particle loading. One of the outstanding questions in nanoparticle collection is the particle size at which the effect of thermal rebound on collection efficiency can be observed. Theoretical calculations indicate that the effect probably can be observed only for particles smaller than 1 nm, but experimental confirmation is difficult at present because of lack of instruments for classifying and counting subnanoscale particles. Two promising devices based on filtration principles have been studied in recent years: multilayer filters and inertial fibrous filters. Multilayer filters, which are composed of nanofiber and microfiber mats, have potential to become an efficient and economical device for removing nanoparticles from gas streams. The inertial fibrous filter operates at high flow rates and relatively low pressure drop, thereby offering an attractive alternative to low-pressure impactors for nanoparticle sampling. Further development of these two types of filtration devices is needed to make them simple and reliable.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available