4.6 Article

Study on Mass Transfer-Reaction Kinetics of NO Removal from Flue Gas by Using a UV/Fenton-like Reaction

Journal

INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
Volume 51, Issue 37, Pages 12065-12072

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ie300883f

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51206067]
  2. New Teacher Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China
  3. Key Laboratory of Water and Air Pollution Control of Guangdong Province of China [2011A060901002]
  4. Fund for Senior Personnel of Jiangsu University [12JDG042]
  5. Jiangsu 'Six Personnel Peak' Talent-Funded Projects [2011-ZBZZ-27]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The mass transfer-reaction kinetics of NO removal from flue gas by using a UV/Fenton-like reaction was investigated in a lab-scale UV-bubbling column reactor. The results show that the NO absorption rate increases with the increase of UV radiation intensity and H2O2 concentration, but the growth rates become smaller gradually. NO absorption rates increase with the increase of Cu2+ concentration and NO concentration but decrease with the increase of SO2 concentration. The absorption of NO by using a UV/Fenton-like reaction is a pseudo-first-order fast reaction with respect to NO, thus the chemical reaction rate of NO removal is much larger than the mass transfer rate, and the mass transfer process is the main control step of the NO absorption process. NO absorption can be further strengthened by increasing the gas phase mass transfer coefficient, the gas-liquid specific interfacial area, and the NO partial pressure. The validation results of the NO absorption rate equation indicate that the calculated values are in good agreement with the experimental values. The maximal average error is less than 2.0%, and the maximal error is less than 10.1% between the calculated values and the experimental values.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available