4.6 Article

Production of Reactive Oxygen Species by Photoactive Anthraquinone Compounds and Their Applications in Wastewater Treatment

Journal

INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
Volume 50, Issue 9, Pages 5326-5333

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ie101423v

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [CTS 0424716]
  2. College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences of the University of California, Davis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

2-Anthraquinone sulfonate (2-AQS) was found to exhibit an abnormally high singlet-oxygen quantum yield in aqueous solution after UVA irradiation based on a widely used testing method for singlet oxygen. To discover the cause of the abnormal results, several possible reactive oxygen species were also measured in the system. Results revealed that 2-AQS and two other similar compounds produced singlet oxygen, hydroxyl radicals, and superoxide, so-called reactive oxygen species (ROS), under UVA exposure. The production of hydroxyl radical contributed to the abnormally high quantum yield. Quantifications of the ROS produced by these compounds were conducted by oxidation of p-nitrosodimethylaninline in the presence and absence of either L-histidine or superoxide dismutase. EPR results also confirmed the formation of singlet oxygen by these compounds under UVA irradiation. The influence of different exposure times on the formation of ROS was measured for all three photosensitive compounds. The effects of different additives on the production of ROS were also investigated. The results showed that some compounds traditionally known as hydroxyl radical scavengers instead served as hydroxyl radical generation promoters under UVA exposure in the system. Moreover, for the first time, these photosensitive compounds were used to degrade a textile colorant, namely, Reactive Black 5, achieving the total decoloration of this compound within 10 min.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available