4.6 Article

Multivariate Statistical Process Monitoring Based on Statistics Pattern Analysis

Journal

INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
Volume 49, Issue 17, Pages 7858-7869

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ie901911p

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSF [CTS-0853983, CTS-0853748]
  2. Directorate For Engineering
  3. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [0853983] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this work, a new multivariate method to monitor continuous processes is developed based on the statistics pattern analysis (SPA) framework. The SPA framework was proposed recently to address some challenges associated with batch process monitoring, such as unsynchronized batch trajectories and multimodal distribution. The major difference between the principal component analysis (PCA) based and SPA-based fault detection methods is that PCA monitors process variables while SPA monitors the statistics of process variables. In other words, PCA examines the variance-covariance of the process variables to perform fault detection while SPA examines the variance-covariance of the process variable statistics (e.g., mean, variance, autocorrelation, cross-correlation, etc.) to perform fault detection. In this paper, a window-based SPA method is proposed to address the challenges associated with continuous processes such as nonlinear process dynamics. First, the details of the window-based SPA method are presented; then the basic properties of the SPA method for fault detection are discussed and illustrated using a simple nonlinear example. Finally, the potential of the window-based SPA method in monitoring continuous processes is explored using two case studies (a 2 x 2 linear dynamic process and the challenging Tennessee Eastman process). The performance of the window-based SPA method is compared with the benchmark PCA and DPCA methods. The monitoring results clearly demonstrate the superiority of the proposed method.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available