4.6 Article

Studies on Speciation Changes and Mass Distribution of Mercury in a Bituminous Coal-Fired Power Plant by Combining Field Data and Chemical Equilibrium Calculation

Journal

INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
Volume 49, Issue 11, Pages 5197-5203

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ie901361q

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Korea Mine of Environmental Science and Technology (KIEST)
  2. Brain Korea-21 (BK-21)
  3. Korea Environmental Industry & Technology Institute (KEITI) [20071200100500] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Transformation of mercury compounds in combustion flue gas and overall mercury mass balance in a typical bituminous coal-fired power plant were studied Upon decreasing temperature and interaction with flue gas components, oxidized mercury increased across an electrostatic precipitator. A major fraction of particulate mercury was removed in the electrostatic precipitator, and oxidized mercury was removed in wet flue gas desulfurization Hg was mainly speciated into elemental form in the stack emission The measurement of mercury in a real facility and equilibrium calculation showed that coal composition, operating conditions, and flue gas components were the major factors affecting mercury emission and speciation A reliable overall Hg mass balance was obtained from the field measurement. Mercury mainly entered from coal, and lime/limestone feeding was distributed in electrostatic precipitator fly ash (57 6-64.3%), gypsum (4.5-12.9%). effluents (0 5-1 9%), and stack emission (15 2-27 0%) Further, the mass distribution and speciation of mercury in the power plant with simulated coal mixture feeds could be predicted with a chemical equilibrium code in combination with the measured results at the commercial plant.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available